Ursula von Rydingsvard was born in Germany, but has worked for most of her life in New York. Much of her work consists of large, interlocking pieces of cedar, pieced together into massive structures. Her work has a remarkable weight and presence to it.
Scale is a vital element in von Rydingsvard's work. She explains: "The whole basis of scale is in relationship to the human size. Even when it’s outdoors, it’s in relation to the human size, but also in relationship to what surrounds it. In scale it’s incredibly important outdoors to have a presence underneath the sky, underneath the sun, and I never, ever think of competing with what nature does in any way. But I do try to hold my own with the surroundings, to have a presence in the context of the surroundings."
The rich textures and sense of enormity in von Rydingsvard's work is powerful.
Patrick Dougherty, who lives in North Carolina, travels worldwide to create site-specific works of entwined sticks and branches. His sculptures resemble large bird nests, like those a weaver bird would fashion, but conceived on a human scale. It seems to be about habitats--our human dwelling places, and how they come from and separate themselves from the landscape around us. To my eye, his work also possesses a whimsical, almost humorous, quality.
Here is Dougherty talking about his work: "Beyond the huge personal pleasure I gain from working with the simplest materials in a complex world, I believe that a well-conceived sculpture can enliven and stir the imagination of those who pass. For viewers the pleasure is elemental and beyond politics and financial forces. I like activating public spaces and being part of the world of ideas."
Pierre Vivant is a french sculptor and
landscape artist who works mainly in Great Britain. Many of his works concern perspective and
perception. In the "Made in England" series the artist uses a simple slide projector and a portable word generator to project a word at night. This projection alters the English landscape.
He does this by picking or cutting crop wherever the light of the word
falls.
With the light of dawn, the landscape
reclaims the site and shows the word correctly only from the exact point of view
of the projector. In the "Made In England" series the artist sought to show that the continued beauty of the English landscape is but a screen which conceals the massive changes in food production.The field pictured below is now a gulf course.
Thirty years ago, accessing the private thoughts of celebrities, artists and public figures was unimaginable. Then the Internet happened, and the public now has direct access to Twitter accounts, blogs, and personal websites - we know what our favorite celebrities are up to, what they're eating, and which words they always misspell.
In the case of artists, this instant access is very gratifying. Blogs offer backstage passes into the lives and thought process of contemporary artists. Check out this blog by land artist Richard Shilling. He writes about his travels to Nepal, his artistic musings and seeing his work heavily advertising in the paper. Before art students and admirers may have seen his work in galleries or read an interview with him in a magazine, but now they have unique access to the work of artists like Richard Shilling.
Revival Field: Themes of Change, Mutability
and Transformation
Heather
Phillips
History
of Contemporary Art
Dr.
Alford
January
2013
This
one 1800-word blog post is a combination of the two 900-word blog post
requirements. All images are credited to Mel Chin’s website: http://melchin.org/oeuvre/revival-field
Artists have used land as a medium in a variety of different ways
since the Earthworks movement in the 1970s. While early Earthworks artists
focused on formal issues while creating minimalistic geometric forms,
contemporary artists often use land as metaphors and comment on current pressing
environmental and societal issues. Current day land artists use earth in a
larger variety of ways, even tackling discussions of politics and social
issues. For more than a decade, Mel Chin has embodied this new generation of
land artists while embracing several ways to use land to offer inquiries into
modern-day living. Through his array of interests, Chin’s work blends the lines
of science, social activism and art in his use of land.Chin’s multi layered work crosses through many
mediums including: toxic earth, soil analysis research, video games, works
re-purposing abandoned homes, and many others. These aspects of his art have
caused confusion by writers and critics.Though many struggle to classify his work, it
is often lumped together in the board category of activist art.This categorization, though it provides a
convenient lens through which to view his work, does his work an injustice. Ultimately,
Chin’s work is a cross-media poetic expression of change for himself, and others,
as well as the transformation towards that change.This central theme in his work can be seen in
one of Chin’s most famous works: Revival
Field.
Revival Field
Many who review the artwork of Mel Chin are quick to point out the
issue of classification. Though Chin is classically trained, his art is analytical and poetic and evades easy classification.[1] Mel Chin’s work is
hard to classify because of the variety of topics he explores which span across
many mediums. Chin bridges fields of inquiry in the creation of his
pieces.However, this aspect of his work
has gained flak from many critics and other outside sourceswho
often describe his work as being “whatever concept fires his imagination — in whatever medium seems
appropriate.”[2] Chin’s work often has a political edge as well as a research component.
These qualities led to initial disappointment in the creation process of Revival Field. This work by Chin
featured an experimental polluted field using plants whose offspring might hold
the cure for decontamination. Though seen as a science project by some, Chin’s
assertion of Revival Field as an art piece
was a strategic act in order to gain funding. [3]When official government agencies were reluctant to fund the
implementation of an alternative approach,
Chin transferred the experiment from the domain of art, because art is exempt
from regulations, certificates, and authorizations.[4] Current government methods
of disposing polluted land were already expensive; agencies saw funding Chin’s
work as only adding to the cost. Still, Chin’s choice was also made to assert the
many possible mediums for art work as a generator of change, a central aspect
of Chin’s work.
Despite Chin’s assertion, however, he still encountered opposition for
another reason.Upon a request for
funding from the National Endowment for the Arts, the grant was denied after council
members had criticized the project for being too political in nature.[5] The grant
was ultimately denied, however, because of its connection to environmental
research: “Endowment Chairman John E. Frohnmayer rejected a proposal to fund Revival Field because he insisted it
pertained to the EPA, the Environmental Protection Agency, not the NEA.”[6] Though
funding for Revival Field was
eventually secured, the initial funding issue displays both the confusion and
objections concerning the levels of meaning in Chin’s artwork.
In explaining the multiplicity of topics and mediums in his work, Chin
states: “My work takes difficult political and ecological dilemmas and
expresses such topics in symbolic forms. I am interested in the mechanics of
ideas... I explore Ideas and how we live, what kind of society we have. I look
for a game plan, a possibility.”[7] Chin’s quest in exploring possibilities produce
works which are similar in that they pertain to today’s society, and possess no
limitations. By not having limitations, Chin’s work crosses many disciplines. The
root of the work lies in an idea new to the artist and society in general,
resulting in a work which provides possibilities unseen before. Chin’s art does
possess many ideas, mediums, and statements. Even so, a common thread
throughout his work is the metaphor of change and transformation.
Working on Revival Field
Revival Field is a work by Mel Chin which accurately displays
the artist’s use of change and transformation.The art projectis a circular
field of polluted land which features crops that are planted, maintained, and
harvested when they reach maturity. The key to eliminating the toxicity lies in
re-planting. The dense roots of the hyperaccumulators absorb the
contaminating metals from the soil and the harvested plants are incinerated at low
temperatures. The planting process is repeated until the site's toxicity
level is safe and acceptable.[8] The
change in Revival Field happens
literally as soil purification occurs through the growing and replanting
process. Chin started the project with a hunch about toxin-absorbing plants and
contacted scientists throughout the world. Eventually he learned of a research
paper that led him to his collaborator. Working with U.S. Department of
Agriculture agronomist Rufus Chaney, the artist proposed an art project introducing
a variety of species called hyperaccumulators that Chaney had been studying [9].
In Revival Field “[t]he success of
his work is measured in terms of real, not metaphoric, change.”[10] One display
of change in this work occurs through the well documented results. These
results, if they portray success in the purification process, could also lead
to a change in how we handle hazardous waste sites.
The hard facts showing change is but one way this work expresses
transformation. A change in your way of thinking occurs. Chin has listed this
change as an important condition. Chin believes that the survival of his own ideas may not be as
important as a condition he might create for others’ ideas to be realized.[11]
In today’s world, land (unpolluted land especially) is becoming more and more
scarce. Revival Field also presents a
change in a person’s way of thinking Chin pursues in the viewer as well as in
himself:
If you approach everything with a critical eye or mind, then the
world will reveal itself as something that's quite impossible to change. The
human ecological track record is so horrific that I don't have much hope for
it, really But the moment that you're captured by some other possibility, the
moment when you discover art that's new to you , other philosophies, other
music —those moments are very rare, but they transform you. Art can change who
you are. I don't think about changing the world; I think about changing
myself.[12]
Revival Field displays how change plays a central role in
the artwork of Mel Chin. Chin goes about trying to change his outlook on societal
topics, eventually seeking to share these possibilities with others. This
process can be seen in how Chin went about planning Revival Field. After studying the nature of pollution, Chin
was able to find another who shared in his theory for purification of earth.
The outcome was a new way to view the rate of land consumption through the possibility
of purifying land previously unworkable. This new way of thinking is first new
to the artist; this new found method then becomes a possibility when shared as
an artwork to the public.
Art:21 Segment on Mel Chin
Another way to view the art projects
of Mel Chin is through not just change, but mutability. Chin’s works embody the
notion of mutability through the transformation process that so often occurs in
his works. The changes he instigates apply to three categories-nature, the
human mind, and art-and can affect reform throughout culture. Revival Field is a
prototype for converting many forms of careless behavior into responsible
action. In this way Revival Field mutates as it transmutes despair over terrestrial despoilment into rays of hope. [13] Change occurs in Revival
Field literally as the land becomes cleansed. A transformation also occursthrough a change in the way one views
land consumption. However, another level of transformation is present in the
polluted land itself. The toxic environments Chin works with are products of
irresponsible misuse of hazardous materials. From this portrait of carelessness
Chin crafts a project employing responsible action, research and purification.
An irresponsible action mutates into a responsible one considerate of humanity,
in an effort to make a change for the greater good.
Mel Chin ultimately uses the aspect of change in order to present a catalyst
of sorts: “My goal for art is to create a condition where one can see the
possibility of change. Art is not static, it is catalytic. Art is not just a
language, its useful, it makes things function. It has a critical relationship
in society, not members of an elite. We have our function in society.”[14] In
light of this goal, an example of a successful work of art in Chin’s eyes is
seen in Revival Field. Chin’s goal of
finding change in the way he thinks, resulting in a new possibility for society
to benefit from, is achieved in Revival
Field.This possibility transforms
the mindset of society as well.Revival Field is a catalyst for change
both through the way one thinks and the functionality of earth itself. If the
project is successful, it will change how we treat toxic land, making it functional
once more.Therefore, Revival Field is not just an example of
Chin’s thematic use of change, transformation, and mutability. Its catalytic
nature makes it, in the eyes of the artist, a successful work of art society
can draw from.
Revival Field serves to portray
many aspects of Mel Chin’s work. The controversy involving the funding of the
work displays the confusion surrounding the multi-disciplinary and multi-media
approach Chin uses in his works. This work shows the theme of change,
transformation, and mutability resulting in the catalytic quality Chin strives
for. These themes are present in many layers of the work. The first layer of
change is seen through the literal change from toxic to purified, dangerous and
untouchable to useful once again. From this transformation, a second change has
the possibility of occurring: a change in how the government treats hazardous waste.
A second layer is present that demonstrates Chin’s proposed method in all of
his works. Chin arrives to a new way of thinking which he shares with society.
This new way of thinking and treating hazardous waste gives Revival Field the catalytic quality the
artist strives for. Lastly, a third layer is present in what the land stood for
in its beginnings. By using the toxic earth as a catalyst for societal change,
Chin displays a mutation from land showing the irresponsibility of humans to
land showing transformation for the greater good.
[2] Cudlin, Jeffry. 2010.
"Working By Any Means Necessary: A Conversation with Mel Chin."
Sculpture (Washington, D.C.) 29, no. 2: 32-39. Art Full Text (H.W. Wilson),
EBSCOhost (accessed February 17, 2013).
Criticized as Political.” The
Washington Post. LexisNexis (accessed Feburary 15, 2013).
[6] Weintraub, 49.
[7] Weintraub, 48.
[8] Phillips, Patricia C. 1997.
"Subverting landscape: the work of Mel Chin." Public Art Review 8,
4-8. Art Full Text (H.W. Wilson), EBSCOhost (accessed February 18, 2013).
Land artist James Turrell is currently at work on one of the largest pieces of art on the planet--his Roden Crater, begun in 1979. He is transforming the three-mile-wide site (located near Flagstaff, Arizona) into an enormous installation: an observatory of sorts, configured towards the summer and winter solstices. This work functions as a massive nexus between heaven and earth, and as such is an outrageously ambitious project. Vast, empty, and suffused with light, it represents a true American Sublime.
Of his work, Turrell says, "It’s about perception. For me, it’s using light as a material to influence or affect the medium of perception. I feel that I want to use light as this wonderful and magic elixir that we drink as Vitamin D through the skin—and I mean, we are literally light-eaters—to then affect the way that we see. We live within this reality we create, and we’re quite unaware of how we create the reality. So the work is often a general koan into how we go about forming this world in which we live, in particular with seeing." I would love to experience this site in person. I imagine one would feel dwarfed by the immensity of both earth and sky.
Contemporary earthworks manipulate the land into art. As Heather's thesis points out, it's impossible to disconnect these contemporary works with ancient ones -- ancient earthworks continue to inspire modern artists, but the causes for creation have evolved over the years.
The topic of my own thesis is Andrew Rogers' enormous geoglyphs. He was inspired by the Nazca Lines in southern Peru. At first formed in the shapes of monkeys, hummingbirds, whales, etc., these gigantic geoglyphs started transforming into geometric patterns like trapezoids and rectangles. In National Geographic Magazine, Markus Reindel of the German Archeological Institute says, "Our idea is that they weren't meant as images to be seen anymore, but stages to be walked upon, to be used for religious ceremonies."
In present day, geoglyphs are not carved into the earth as ceremonial walkways, irrigation systems, or as -- in one theory -- messages to the gods. In the case of artist Andrew Rogers, he wanted to make a mark on the world and connect the Earth with his larger-than-life sculptures. The causation for creating land art has changed significantly since the days of the Nasca Lines in southern Peru.